The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.
The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who practices with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He is the author of the Physicians' Privacy Manual. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.
For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.
This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.
Thursday, March 03, 2005
I'm having a tough time keeping up with all the commentary related to privacy that has accompanied the ChoicePoint and Bank of America incidents. I may just post pointers and snippets until I clear up the backlog:
Can We Get Some Privacy, Please? :: Internet World:
"...But wait a second - just what is a 'data broker,' anyway? It's a company that makes money by compiling, storing and selling information about you and me - which carries with it some grave responsibilities. I have to admit that the whole industry makes me a little uncomfortable. Sure, companies like ChoicePoint and Westlaw may find our 'personal information' in a quasi-legitimate manner, but when that data is stolen, already pre-wrapped in nice convenient little data packets, it is potentially very dangerous. The work is already done for the identity thief, and leaks the size of the ChoicePoint breach have the potential to efficiently fuel a seedy industry of 'identity brokers.' Some Oregon politico called the incident the 'Exxon Valdez of privacy,' which I thought was apropos. The problem is, we've had other oil spills, and you can bet that we'll see more data leaks - and they're just as difficult to clean up.
One final thought: Although new laws are obviously necessary, making things TOO difficult for private data aggregators may not be the answer, because then the burden of maintaining and protecting personal information might logically be placed on THE GOVERNMENT, and that's a road I'd rather not go down...."
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.