The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.
The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who practices with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He is the author of the Physicians' Privacy Manual. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.
For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.
This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has just released another bunch of new findings. I haven't read them yet, but I'll probably have a comment or two when I get a chance:
- "PIPEDA Case summary #346: E-mail message raises questions about purposes, credibility and accountability
- PIPEDA Case summary #345: Private school not covered by PIPEDA
- PIPEDA Case summary #344: Couple's safety deposit box opened in error
- PIPEDA Case summary #343: Insurance company requires property owners to collect tenants' personal information
- PIPEDA Case summary #342: Owner allowed to disclose tenants’ rent information
- PIPEDA Case summary #341: Fees and the role of a medical practitioner considered in denial of access complaint
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.